|
In the interest of speed and timeliness, this story is fed directly from the Associated Press newswire and may contain spelling or grammatical errors.
|
Medical examiners use numerous tests to determine identity
Tuesday April 15, 2003
By BETH FOUHY Associated Press Writer
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) Forensic experts say that even badly
decomposed human corpses, like those of a woman and an infant boy
that washed up on a bayside park, still offer up numerous clues
that can guide investigators in making a positive identification.
Examiners are trying to determine if the woman's body found
Monday is that of missing Modesto resident Laci Peterson, the focus
of a massive search since she was last seen on Christmas Eve. She
was eight months pregnant at the time, due to give birth to a baby
boy in February.
On Sunday, the body of an infant was discovered about a mile
from where the woman's body was later found. Examiners are trying
to determine if there is a link between the two.
Dr. Henry Lee, former director of the Connecticut State Police
Forensic Science Laboratory and a noted criminologist who provided
expert testimony in the O.J. Simpson murder trial, said examiners
often do a series of initial anthropological measurements on
skeletal remains, particularly bones, as a first step in making an
identification.
``Even in water, bones will not shrink or expand,'' Lee said.
``They are constant.''
If the height of the skeleton is determined not to match the
height of a missing person, Lee said that person can be eliminated.
Making a positive identification, as opposed to ruling someone
out, is usually more difficult and time consuming. Experts said
that analyzing dental records is the best way to identify a body
that has decomposed, but that particular measurement may not be of
help in this case. A Contra Costa County sheriff's deputy would not
comment Tuesday on published reports that the woman's body came
ashore missing its head and legs.
Fingerprints are also a key way to determine identity. Lee said
that even after months in the water, if there is any remnant of
skin on the victim's fingers a fingerprint can be reconstructed. An
examiner would remove skin cells from the fingers and place them in
a petri dish, adding glycerine to let them slowly rehydrate.
Eventually, the print would be recreated.
If dental and fingerprint records can't be used, the next step
would be to extract DNA from the body, usually from a dense bone
such as the thigh bone. Examiners would then compare it to a DNA
sample lifted from personal items.
``Things used by her and only by her,'' said Benny DelRe,
director of the Santa Clara County Crime Lab. ``Her toothbrush,
since it would have cell samples from her mouth. The razor she uses
to shave her legs. A hairbrush that has some hair with root
material attached. Any of those would be great reference items.''
If comparing the DNA sample to those items proved inconclusive,
DelRe said investigators would probably seek a blood test from the
victim's mother and father, to do a so-called paternity workup.
A paternity workup would also be the best way to determine
whether the body of the infant came from the dead woman.
``You would take a DNA test from the fetus and compare it with
her, and with Mr. Peterson, to determine paternity,'' said Lee.
(Copyright 2003 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
|