|
In the interest of speed and timeliness, this story is fed directly from the Associated Press newswire and may contain spelling or grammatical errors.
|
Federal agencies criticized for biotech oversight
Thursday June 19, 2003
By PAUL ELIAS AP Biotechnology Writer
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) Coors Brewing Co., Frito-Lay and H.J. Heinz
were among the U.S. companies that dabbled in genetically modified
crops in recent years even as consumer acceptance of such products
remained in doubt.
The gene-splicing experiments were among thousands of similar
tests broadly outlined in a 600-page report criticizing federal
regulators that was released Wednesday by the advocacy group
Environment California Research & Policy Center.
The center is among environmental groups that claim poor
government oversight of the open-air tests that could allow
``genetic contamination'' of the food supply.
The report showed 15,400 open-air experiments have been done
involving more than 100 crops since the Department of Agriculture
first started permitting them in 1987, the anti-biotech group said.
The trials took place at more than 40,000 locations in all but
three states.
A record number of applications to sell genetically engineered
crops for human consumption is expected to soon follow, the center
said.
Monsanto Co. and DuPont and its subsidiaries have applied for
thousands of Department of Agriculture permits to experiment with
genetically altered plants in the last 16 years.
Food and beverage makers, such as Coors' work with engineered
barley, dabbled with genetically modified crops, though no major
food maker has applied for a permit since 2000.
Most of the outdoor experiments were approved in the last five
years, with a dramatic influx occurring since 2001 and involving
seed companies.
According to the report, most of the experiments have been
carried out in Hawaii, followed by Illinois, Iowa, Puerto Rico and
California.
The most active applicant by far is Monsanto, which applied for
3,309 field experiments since 1987. Corn, cotton and potatoes were
the three most popular crops for experimentation.
Few of these products have been sold to the public, and soy and
corn are the only two approved food crops that are widely
engineered.
The United States is embroiled in a bitter trade dispute with
the European Union over its refusal to accept genetically
engineered food, while Monsanto is aggressively moving to get its
modified wheat approved for human consumption.
``This is a very pivotal time for biotechnology,'' said Leonard
Gianetti of the biotech industry-supported National Center for Food
& Agricultural Policy.
Gianetti said many biotechnology researchers are in the final
stages of their experiments on crops with such genetically
engineered improvements as resistance to bugs and weed killers.
Biotech analysts said the increased research activity is a good
sign for a beleaguered industry that needs to bolster its bottom
line, as well as for farmers looking to improve their yields and
profits.
But the Environment California concludes in Wednesday's report
that USDA oversight of the experiments has been lax, putting the
public and environment at risk.
``The agency denies almost no permits, authorizes a large number
of permits and allows little public scrutiny,'' said Richard
Caplan, the report's author.
USDA spokesman Jim Rogers declined comment, saying the agency
hadn't reviewed the study.
Another advocacy group, meanwhile, released its own report
Wednesday, accusing the Environmental Protection Agency of shirking
its responsibility to ensure that genetically modified crops don't
harm the environment.
Nearly 10,000 Midwest farms that grow genetically modified corn
failed to plant enough naturally growing corn on their land to
prevent insect from becoming resistant to the modified plants, the
Center for Science in the Public Interest found.
The EPA requires that a farmer's genetically engineered corn
crop be ringed by natural corn equal to 20 percent of the entire
harvest. The center found that many Midwest farmers aren't planting
any natural corn.
``Noncompliance on this scale shows that current regulations
aren't up to the task,'' said the center's Gregory Jaffe. The
center says it unearthed violations after filing Freedom of
Information Act requests with the USDA.
Jaffe said the EPA and the biotech industry needs to increase
inspections and better educate farmers on how to plant genetically
modified crops.
EPA spokesman Dave Deegan said the agency will consider the
center's recommendations, but it believes it already has tough
regulations in place.
Editors: Associated Press Writer Emily Gersema contributed to
this story from Washington D.C.
^ =
On the Net:
Environment California: http://www.environmentcalifornia.org
National Center for Food & Agricultural Policy:
http://www.ncfap.org
USDA biotechnology site:
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/programs/biotechregsvcs.html
(Copyright 2003 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
|